No. 21-5159

Alfred P. Centofanti, III v. Nevada

Lower Court: Nevada
Docketed: 2021-07-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: americans-with-disabilities-act due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus medical-disability pro-se stay-proceedings
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the denial of a pro se inmate with stage IV cancer's requests to extend filing deadlines, stay the proceedings, refer the appeal to a pro bono program, or to appoint counsel to either accommodate or assist one with a medical disability was a denial of Due Process, and Equal Protection Rights under the U.S. Constitution and a further violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

questions presented for review were presented in briefs, motions, supplements, and a 13 | fully briefed Petition for Review (Petition, Answer, Reply) and denied on the merits, but without 14 || Centofanti being provided access to the Courts. 15 Question One: Whether the denial of a pro se inmate with stage IV cancer’s requests to 16 || extend filing deadlines, stay the proceedings, refer the appeal to a pro bono program, or to appoint 17 | counsel to either accommodate or assist one with a medical disability was a denial of Due Process, 18 || and Equal Protection Rights under the U.S. Constitution and a further violation of the Americans 19 || with Disabilities Act? 20 Question Two: Whether Nevada courts abdicated their responsibilities by failing to allow 21 || challenges to prison COVID-19 restrictions that denied inmates access to the Courts? 22

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Alfred Centofanti
Alfred Centofanti III — Petitioner