Gregory Scott Stephen v. United States
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Was the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit's conclusion that a private citizen can never be established as a government agent absent the knowledge and acquiescence of the police correct for Fourth Amendment purposes?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED a + i 1. Was the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit's conclusion that a private citizen can never be established asa government agent absent the knowledge and acquiescence of the police correct for Fourth Amendment purposes? Ls 2. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit correctly determine that the DCI Agents that searched : ' petitioner's residences and the devices found within those residences was not in excess of the scope of the search warrant? i { Fi ' 3. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth.Circuit correctly determine that petitioner's sentence adequately ; accounted/for his acceptance of responsibility by pleading guilty in a timely manner even though it made no change in the a advisory Guideline sentence? 4 iy, 4. In child pornography cases, should all images and videos be subject to the Dost faciors to define them as child pornography, i and should the judge view the files to define them? . ' | i ; { . i : ; : ; : ‘i i I i , ' z i . . : ie ;