Whether the re-sentencing of the petitioner to 25 years, which exceeded the lawful sentence, violated the 8th Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _ (A) That Judge Hilt re-sentenced Coker to 25 years on uct. 2008, which was > times the amount ailoweo py taw, cruel and unusual punisnment, violated 8th Amendment of U.S. Constitution, against Coker. (B) The charge was for not registering as a sex offender, based on Coker‘s oid 1979 enticina for indecent purposes over in Cobb County Superior Court, Maritta, Georgia: llileqal iIndicment bv them. (Cj) That the St Clair County Grand Jury did illegally and unlawfully re-indict Coker of the on or about Jdune~-2007, of Cobb County Superior Court-1979.. (D) That the D.A. of St Clair County, Pell City, ACA did re-try and re-convict Coker on approx. June 2U08and got Cokerreconvicted of the again the second time in : violation of the Fitth Amend. Double jeopardy Clause, and deprivea him of its protection. (Bj) That the Ai Court Crim. Appeais did reverse tne Appellant Cpker’s case no.: CR-id-1177 on Dec. 2016, and ordered Coker a new hearing in St Cia1r County Cir. Court. (fF) Yhat the St Clair County Cir. Court, D.A. and Judge Weathington on Aug. 2017, did illegally and unlawtuliy re-enhance Coker's sentence to 25 years again on approx. Sept. 2017, even though tney knew full weil that the at Legisiature nad created a law that abolished Ai. enhancement Act 446, on Gct. 2013, from 1980 forward, anda Gov. Ivey signed it into Law. (G) That the Ennancement iaw St Ciair County used on Coker in | Aug. 2UL7 18 void, and Coker’s sentence 15 now iitegqai ana unlawtul by operation of the Oct. 20143 abolishing otf AL Enhancement Act 446, by the AL begisilature and Gov. Ivey. (H) nat ail the above stated did violate the Appeitant U.S. Const. Amend. Rights of ist, Stn, stn, and ia4tn amend.’s ana aia deprive the Appeliant ot them. : (1) nat there is no triai transcript, ana never have peen one. | Le | aA ee) STOR PARTIES ( ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. i) All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all