Whether the petitioner's First Amendment free speech rights were violated when he was ordered to 'Speak Up!' in violation of the First Amendment's prohibition on compelled speech

Questions Presented FOR REVIEW . ‘ = oy fe ® SL a CeCe; Nav were .28.d.your-tg hiks-+.torg byte ¢ ——, _ i Is. habe v. Drsmoaond, "0200 343cLi02, TIp-3%, line. 245 Court Repectec inpostded —_ [én audible?" in 2ctyadityy the Retdiinecexecting his 2 3 5. being told to__“Speak Up! sin wiolacbion.of US, Const. §* Amend. LEL.Conobhrty Ste 9 RE SH PEACE TE PO VOTATY 2 CGE SHES“ FF — TR SEITE SU OEPET SE LOE THES HOOF SBE PZ "SLY EPIT YK SFI2 JO iva 7 TT DIALS ESN BOE CPTIOA A SIEGOCYD |Z ——— ‘ £ aaa SF POL BELT PE A SEG 8DTOT PIN BOE AVOUT OTT . . SIS VALI , Tt FOSS EROS ES eI RCN IGE BITE 8O Pp opNpUT IE TEP OR hp ON tir porn rey 21009 TOT POE HINT " : oom prem Prorogery ap 15 Teg 2B FeO pIDOLI LT ESI OLY THF EOE LA ALTOT 01 27 7] EDT IET FO PSY GY (¢.)