Whether the convictions on counts 13-14 should be vacated due to erroneous jury instructions, given that the 10-year consecutive sentence was derived from those counts

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ~ The petitioner "was not charged with aiding and abetting in : : counts 11-14 but the court allowed the jury to returno a guilty . verdict on those counts based upon admittedly erroneous jury : instreution". Therefore, should the convictions in cts 13-14 also _ be Vacated seeing that the 10 yr consecutive ‘sentence was ‘@erived from the consecutive counts and he has already served the original , portion? 5 . . | : ; . .