Should the Ashrict court's denial of the defendant's motion for payment of attorney's fees be reversed by the Third Circuit?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . . Should Thee Ashrict court's denial of o~ dextendont 5 moyion Lor \odayment of OE KEE icmed bh the Third Ciccitr IVA The op PRicmance clearly co L iets wi] tr i tS 9 eg eterctive, preetent as wall he de rulings of the Wine roitont Fi tices i Tahoe, fT TRRtA Cire it, OO5@ IA Hastion® | et Th Some pots : , Should ir be A Violation. of the ath When There WAS no cobable. onusa. tp 5 anal xppetlont Mari. Nasiet y. Skoef, 1 nPormott on fq: led a a) Vo tobe. When Mere Known. borage un; P COMME Mie Nasi with the 3 OAL Uh an Pott o42R, rs Fu speete +9 hold chrdys i ShoulA Hare Thied-c ° | Process Quad dye ah be rn ney Ow ‘fondant de U.S. Const. oumen oo | . a Im Porto yy’ Nd condidly athenoutlel wee Phe sedehy <9 oF o-wvegl low ombortdy ok in hear inclinast rr PO orehit . . . 7 LISTOF PARTIES . x All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ } All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of ' all