No. 21-5191

Tammy H. Hepburn v. Teleperformance

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights-act discovery employment-discrimination evidence failure-to-preserve-evidence hostile-work-environment litigation racial-discrimination spoliation-of-evidence title-vii workplace-retaliation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether spoliation of evidence or failure to preserve evidence is relevant to a case when the case has been deemed for litigation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

questions presented are: } ; 1. Whether spoliation of evidence or failure to preserve evidence is relevant to a case when @ the case has been deem for litigation. , @ @ 2 Whether an employee have the right to verbally be called the N-word in the workplace. @ D4 3. Whether the N-word is severe enough to create a hostile work environment under Title r VII of the Civil Right Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. §2000e. e . @ _ 4. Whether the circumstances of the use of racial epithets in the workplace are sufficiently m4 serious enough to create a hostile work environment is protected under Title VII of the ; Civil Right Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. §2000e. D4 5. Whether an employee that show they were treated differently from similar situated 7 e@ employees are protected under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 2000e. @ @ 6. Whether a hostile work environment can create grounds for retaliation. @ @ e e @ e@ e @ e . e e@ @ td e i @ e @ e ® @ e @ ' @

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-23
Brief of respondent Teleperformance in opposition filed.
2021-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Tammy H. Hepburn
Tammy H. Hepburn — Petitioner
Teleperformance
Thom K. CopeMesch Clark Rothschild, Respondent