No. 21-5199
Vincent Johnson v. Tim Shoop, Warden
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Latest Conference:
2021-12-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
What is the correct vehicle and avenue inwhich a petitioner may challange a COA violation by a circuit court pursuant to Buck v. Davis 13? S. Ct. 759 once Certiorari has been denied by the U.S. Supreme court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions
Docket Entries
2021-12-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-10-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-04
Waiver of right of respondent Tim Shoop to respond filed.
2021-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Tim Shoop
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Vincent Johnson
Vincent Johnson — Petitioner