No. 21-5199
Vincent Johnson v. Tim Shoop, Warden
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-12-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION OF FEDERAL LAW FOR REVIEW SnD EISSN OT Ee a What is the correct vehicle and avenue inwhich a petitioner may challange . a COA violation by a circuit court pursuant to Buck v. Davis 137:S. Ct. a 759 once Certiorari has been denied by the U.S. Supreme court. RELIEF SOUGHT To be immediately released from prision. | . LN
Docket Entries
2021-12-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-10-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-04
Waiver of right of respondent Tim Shoop to respond filed.
2021-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Tim Shoop
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Vincent Johnson
Vincent Johnson — Petitioner