Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals should have determined if the district court judge was judicially disabled

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. When reviewing a district court’s ruling to dismiss a civil case dismissed on Motion for Summary Judgment should the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ignored to determine whether Honorable Judge Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge was judicially disabled to hear this Civil Case due to Petitioner’s Civil Action against Honorable Judge Paul W. Grimm ; pending in the United States Supreme Court on Petition for a Writ of Certiorari No. 20-1638, 2. Whether the U.S. District Court Judge; Honorable Judge Paul W. Grimm was judicially disabled to hear Civil Case 8:19-CV-00248-PWG; appeal No. 201243; Edokobi v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al: et al pursuant to Judicial Disability Act of 1980, 28 US.C. §§ 351-364 (‘ACT’), and pursuant to rules for judicial-conduct and judicialdisability proceedings, 248 F.R.D. 674 (2008); 3. Whether Honorable Judge Paul W. Grimm erred in granting Respondent SunTrust’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.65) by falsely claims that; on August 14, 2018, following the telephone con; ference with Edokobi and Toyota, SunTrust refunded Edokobi the two $36.00 in the Civil Case No. 8:19CV-00248-PWG; appeal No. 20-1243; 4, Whether Honorable Judge Paul W. Grimm ‘ erred in granting Respondent Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 66 for the Civil Case No. 8:19-CV-00248-PWG; appeal No. 20-1243; 5. Whether Honorable Judge Paul W. Grimm erred in denying as moot ECF No.39 Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Respondent SunTrust’s count il . ~~--erclaim ECF No 15 pursuant to F. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).__ oo. and 12(b)(1) the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction a to hear SunTrust’s counterclaim of breach of contact, in the Appeilant’s Civil Case No. 8:19-CV-00248-PWG; 6. Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred by ignoring Petitioner’s persistence claims that Honorable Judge Paul W. Grimm treated Petitioner with animosity by returning Petitioner’s pleading . ECF No. 20-1 Case No. 0248-PWG Petitioner’s counterclaim against Respondent SunTrust and by returning Petitioner’s Motion ECF No. 26 Case No. 0248-PWG a motion to compel SunTrust to accept TMCC’S Check Number 7481 in the amount of $536.34; 7. Whether Respondent Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (“TMCC”) erred by threatening to send Darcars Toyota at 12210 cherry hill road Silver Spring, . . Maryland 20904 to repossess Petitioner’s Nissan Altima 2014 pursuance to TMCC’S letter that Petitioner received on May 22-2021 and that, Petitioner is not behind in Petitioner’s monthly car note payment in the amount of $268.17 to Respondent TMCC. iii’ -