Did the lower courts err in failing to grant a hearing on the constitutional issues raised by the petitioner in habeas corpus?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i) Did tLe hwer courts err in Failing fo Grawft q hearing on Spe. SSUES of ¢ Constitehione! aetire relsed by the Let’ honer in habeas coups ® 2) As Apis Court hes never hed en eppertenity He expound en He fuse excep Hon fo She Spee 7 Triof Act of fre bwntted Sfofes Code. g WAS jt 4, peek le. Po phe petitioner, Abus 60 YS ti gq , | EOL bine! viehpion in his exrinine! (proceed rags over 1G gears a7? f 3) Ls SORNA 9.900 up ot unlonsttut/one| Pederol Jews which were written Fo Ferg et a polhelly ler role « sub tect in het minoeity reup Un Popu al Yovial De rchs easing d He rights vd privileges j" ented fo Ae generd poguliees Phus viokting Phe E. pu Pips ctions ot he Constitution £ 1) Ze Federe/ Supervised kelease. ¢ vicls tion of He Anti Dele s ofon Cheuse. ot the Coastite fin? 5) Does Feders/ Supervised Releose violate. any proviscons agent indetermngte. Sentencing , nspecilh fe Shese subject vo Set ige suger vision?