No. 21-5204

Walter Patrick v. Jimmy Thomas, Warden

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection incarceration standing statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Eleventh Circuit err in holding that a petitioner cannot challenge an expired statute of limitations?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Did the Elevewth Pircuth failed +40 | eppachens net “eclual inialocgalt" 4 A GNE| werd thauah which a eelhoner an cy deste end erngedural Atkau Or exPired Slrrute af linnitetions. MeOuicGis v. Parkins ; 56% 15.28% 3A, : . © JOD 5.64. 1924 11928 C2013). : . Does THe ELEVENTH CIACOIT COUAT HoLd | CORTMERS T ee nnCeR aren NE Th THAT DIAALLOL) INCAR CERAT CITIZEAK To LITIGME: BY HOLDING Palen | ERS TD A STANDARD THAT GOED PROFESS ION| ALS IN THE LALO PROFESS Ion,

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent Jimmy Thomas, Warden to respond filed.
2021-01-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Jimmy Thomas, Warden
Beth Slate PoeAL Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Walter Patrick
Walter Patrick — Petitioner