No. 21-5216
Fredie Phillip Koryal v. Sarah Schroeder, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights district-court due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts erred in denying a certificate of appealability in a habeas corpus case
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. DID THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN AND THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERRONEOUSLY DENY MR. KORYAL’S REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IN THIS ; HABEAS CORPUS CASE WHERE JURISTS OF REASON COULD CLEARLY DEBATE WHETHER KORYAL’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-25
Waiver of right of respondent Sarah Schroeder, Warden to respond filed.
2021-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Sarah Schroeder, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent