Whether the Illinois Courts incorrectly found that petitioner's rights were not violated

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether the Illinois Courts incorrectly found that petitioner’s rights were not violated when he was arrested without a warrant inside his office building pursuant to a deceptive plan formulated by the prosecution, the execution of which was calculated to extract incriminating statements from petitioner through numerous tactics offensive to justice, including but not limited to, concealing from petitioner his arrest and reason as well as misleading him as to the ramifications of a waiver of his Miranda rights? 8 IL. Whether the Illinois Courts erred in refusing to suppress eavesdrop recording where federal eavesdropping law via implied field and implied conflict preemption has preempted Illinois eavesdropping law? 13 (a) Whether lower court failed to conduct statutory construction analysis and de novo review of numerous state errors in this claim resulting in mistake in decision making? (b) Whether the Illinois Supreme court is obligated to follow the Supremacy clause and provide a merit ruling on the abrogation of People v. Nieves, 92 Ill.2d 452 (1982), Judicial Supervision of electronic Surveillance with an immediate sealing requirement by law? 21 Ill. Whether the presiding appellate judge labors under a per se conflict of interest thereby introducing structural error into the appeal? 23 IV. | Whether affirmative mistakes in decision making and mistaken recall of evidence create a H breakdown in the appeal process resulting in standalone Due Process violations? 26 : Vv. Whether the Illinois Supreme Court’s refusal to recall its mandate denied petitioner a fair direct appeal, Due Process and Equal Protection under the law? 36 |