No. 21-5227
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review arrest-warrant civil-rights constitutional-law due-process fourth-amendment home-search investigative-alerts search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities Immigration
Environmental Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Appellate Court of Illinois violate Petitioners Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, by denying his petition due to the differentiation within the First District concerning the constitutionality of Investigative Alerts?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Appellate Court of Illinois violate Petitioners Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, by denying his petition >. due to the differentiation within the First District concerning the constitutionality of Investigative Alerts. 2. Did the use of Investigative Alert bt Chicago Police Department hold the grounds to be serve as as arrest warrant of the Petiti[.-oner at. his~home. (1)
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-26
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2021-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 27, 2021)
Attorneys
Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Sergio Bahena
Sergio Bahena — Petitioner