No. 21-5231
Shaun J. Salazar v. United States
Tags: criminal-justice criminal-procedure due-process federal-law imprisonment revocation sentencing statutory-interpretation statutory-maximum supervised-release united-states-v-haymond
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
CriminalProcedure Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court may impose a revocation imprisonment term under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) that, when combined with a defendant's initial term of imprisonment, exceeds the statutory maximum imprisonment term for the underlying offense
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED This joint petition asks this Court to resolve a question left open two years ago in United States v. Haymond, 139 S.Ct. 2369, 2384 (2019): Whether a district court may impose a revocation imprisonment term under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) that, when combined with a defendant’s initial term of imprisonment, exceeds the statutory maximum imprisonment term for the underlying offense. i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)
Attorneys
Shaun Salazar, et al.
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent