No. 21-5231

Shaun J. Salazar v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-justice criminal-procedure due-process federal-law imprisonment revocation sentencing statutory-interpretation statutory-maximum supervised-release united-states-v-haymond
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a district court may impose a revocation imprisonment term under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) that, when combined with a defendant's initial term of imprisonment, exceeds the statutory maximum imprisonment term for the underlying offense

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED This joint petition asks this Court to resolve a question left open two years ago in United States v. Haymond, 139 S.Ct. 2369, 2384 (2019): Whether a district court may impose a revocation imprisonment term under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) that, when combined with a defendant’s initial term of imprisonment, exceeds the statutory maximum imprisonment term for the underlying offense. i

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)

Attorneys

Shaun Salazar, et al.
Daniel Tyler HansmeierFederal Public Defender's Office for the District of Kansas, Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent