Is it state harassment and is there potential for state harassment when a pretrial detainee cannot seek relief for insufficient grand jury minutes because his trial is suspended because he is ruled incapable to proceed?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | exceptions | The Supreme Covuct has recognized three* to Younger abstention that allow | pretrial habeas corpus relief, Younger v. Harris v. Harris +01 U.S. 37, t4 (1971), | “where (1) there is a showing of bad faith or harassment by state officials responsible | e ' $ , — } for the prosecution; (2) the state law to he applied is the criminal proceeding ‘s | ‘ot Flagarantly and patently viclative of express constitutional provisions, of (3) extraordinary cireumstahges exist thar present a threat of immediate, and irreparable injury.” Qvestics T. , | Is tt state harassment and is there potential for state harassment when a | pretrial $etninee cannot seek relief for insufficient grand jury minutes because his trial is suspended becavse he is tuled iscapable to proceed? Qvestion L. : ; bl , Ls it state harassment(1), patently violative (see 2) , and [oe irrepacable (3) | harm potentially (AND objectively unreasonable force as per Kingsley “ Hendrickson) to force dopamine inhibitor medication as part of a pretrial detainment condition when such devgs have been shown to cause H% hrain weight decrease permanently P | Question it. , | ae . 3)h | Is it state herassment (1) patently vielatve (#862), ond for ireparable (3) hora teatially (AND violative of the [th Ammendment for loss of property and/or liberty) pe to Force dopamine inhibitor medication as part of a pretial detainment condition when svch devqs have been shown to cavse W% brain weight decrease permanently 7 | es oe