Whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated by the imposition of an enhanced sentence under Florida's 10-20-life statute

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED NL Sriee Mis Covey WITH CLeha Hawt “AS k ROwHERGLY Dis CMZ6ED QUALICO GG antvinear? , WO PASSED d, ONRLIFRD SUCMHONE ASIEN IA, (TAINS MILITNG Kuler@d 4 CEPREST Wo BEIS SAMLL BE CUYSED TOW” DVE TD WO OMNER yer} AwheDd WILL BE KONE THIS Kuno BxCERT THE GWE RESINAL meDal GF HOU); PEORSE SET, eyarer (en) Dat WN ME DIES OF ME SPMEME CORT SARLL LIST my G@ieVIE DYE] HS wee? o | 9) Tet DN (AUT TH TURE. ON k PUOKY ME SHE SEC SED@DED UE CKO INcoeMATION «A CRS NO! ()IOHEO KITEMPED FST DECREE MVLOER | Into guid mv} Ture cyler GS IEIONS mio REWAT Fae & CONTACT, THE TAL Cer KGyoe0 ITS DISCRETIN BY FUACWE ME TH PACED TO & SYCSTITIALY gmenldeD CHRREME IN QMTOA) 1 THAT, NO ConTRIED CIMPLELED yp DENG) Mini WS WEERSED cane INKRIAIIN, NEW UFGISURTINE Se MUTIEY UM) OF 10-20-LIFE) Mo KOOrnon Cr | CAKREES Ge EE RKUIKTsD baTTeRY + TAS 1S k VOCATION OF Due Pace QF ITS PASC Sts 3) WE sie WICReHSED CHKOCES WE mH T REQUESTED & Sfe@y Teme = L wars HOVSED INSIDE COWFINEMERT FAA Nin b mows UMOEe Ca AO UNUSURL Stannens . HE SHE wWekenseD THIS CHEE FOC my DOIG WMnr ME OnW HLLoUls p in CASE ND: II IS4EIKEG RWAED Siem I ALS REMKSTED 4 sPeGnp rer IS Sik REQUESTED bk EMER GEARY Movin Cae CONTIN UMVCE = Day Aeor 0 Tone bie 7 THE Derr OF HER FRMEA mewey pDiscovacen One pire wee® Temi EXP HOTEN OF THIS SENTENCE, RT HE sme Cauesrey ) ; ™ nee NT Ch Cm ST CES, ONE 7% HE DEV UE oF SPEEDY waite. , 7 WAS FIG TO ACCEPT ME STAVE OLE HRT whs OFfGe S mons Pade, . 1 CEN HAND DOCTENE | PLINSE SEE BLACKLAW DICT G™ED+ 1962. GE 172 WACA SHES “VHOR TMS HECTEWE, EQury wit NOT BE Gem RELIEF 1) & Pert Wid AS ACHR SEEKS T SET Fyo/Ciae MACHINE WW MIT AVO GOTH Sine REMEDY We SUC fpr IN PLEA ConvieT HAS VNLATED ConlSCINGE YZ GoYO Pai D2 KT Calin OANe Wee 4