No. 21-5255
Nathaniel B. Appleby-El v. Maryland
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process evidence evidence-admission right-to-counsel witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the use of transcripts denied the defendant's right of confrontation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented 1. Whether such extensive reliance on transcripts, denied Mr. ApplebyEl’s federal right of confrontation, because doing so effectively prevented him from cross-examining witnesses? 2. Whether the Circuit Court erred by admitting an alleged confession obtained by police? il Parties and Related Cases The names of all parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page, and there are no
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2021-07-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)
Attorneys
Maryland
Daniel John Jawor — Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent
Daniel John Jawor — Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent
Nathaniel Appleby-El
William Lawrence Welch III — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
William Lawrence Welch III — Attorney at Law, Petitioner