No. 21-5257
Jermaine Latwone Haynes v. Willis Chapman, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fair-trial ineffective-assistance self-defense sentencing-mitigation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Petitioner Denied His Constitutional Right To The Effective Assistance Of Counsel and A Fair Trial Proceeding
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Was Petitioner Denied His Constitutional Right To The Effective Assistance Of Counsel and A Fair Trial Proceeding, Pursuant To U.S. Const., Amends Vi, Xiv; Mich. Const. 1963, Art. 1, §20, Where Defense Counsel failed To:
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-25
Waiver of right of respondent Willis Chapman, Warden to respond filed.
2021-06-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)
Attorneys
Jermaine Latwone Haynes
Jermaine Latwone Haynes — Petitioner
Willis Chapman, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent