No. 21-5261

Shakeel Kahn v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-29
Status: Judgment Issued
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: controlled-substances-act disjunctive-conjunctive good-faith-defense legitimate-medical-purpose mens-rea usual-course-professional-practice
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2021-11-05 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

where-government-prosecutes-medical-practitioner-controlled-substances-act

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Where the government prosecutes a medical practitioner under the Controlled Substances Act for issuing a prescription outside “the usual course of professional practice,” is the government required to prove that the doctor knew or intended that the prescription be outside the scope of professional practice? 2. Does a “good faith” defense in the context of a licensed medical practitioner prosecuted under the Controlled Substances Act protect doctors who have an honest but mistaken belief that they have issued the charged prescription in “the usual course of professional practice;” and, if so, must that belief be objectively reasonable? 3. Should the “usual course of professional practice” and “legitimate medical purposes” prongs of C.F.R § 1306.04(a) be read in the conjunctive or the disjunctive?

Docket Entries

2022-07-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-02-16
The record from the U.S.D.C. District of Wyoming is electronic and located on Pacer. The restricted record containing Sealed, Non-Public, and Ex-Parte pleadings has been electronically filed.
2022-01-18
CIRCULATED
2021-12-21
The record from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.
2021-12-21
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit.
2021-11-05
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 20-1410 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
2021-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-12
Reply of petitioner Shakeel Kahn filed. (Distributed)
2021-09-29
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-08-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 29, 2021.
2021-08-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 30, 2021 to September 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)

Attorneys

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Michael R. DreebenO’Melveny & Myers LLP, Amicus
Michael R. DreebenO’Melveny & Myers LLP, Amicus
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Jeffrey Steven BeelaertStein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP, Amicus
Jeffrey Steven BeelaertStein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP, Amicus
Shakeel Kahn
Beau B. BrindleyThe Law Offices of Beau B. Brindley, Petitioner
Beau B. BrindleyThe Law Offices of Beau B. Brindley, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent