Deprivation of federal habeas review

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | l= The Lower Federal Courts depcived this Petitioner of his congressional right to one Folt round of his initial Federal habeas review by dismissigg Claims of ine FFective ; tri al counsel [without Conducting any merit determination}, and dismissed Rule Go) (4) (6) by abuse oF disccetion in violation oF Supreme court ruling that t Conviction obtained by Racial Factor is infact Extraordinary 60 (6X6) motion that must be granted” BucK, 137 S.C4 759 at 778. . 2... 1+... pages 45,698 . dRacist drunk frial attorney bragged to Petitioner that £°r did not object te the introduction oF Fraudulent RACIAL €-rtail (com. £x.61) to the Jury that Says’ you are Lebanese Arab who taKes Lebanese terrorests to dinner, and Learning to Fly Plains in 0Klohoraa’ to make sure the Jury convicted your SAND NIGGER 1 ene ee ee = pages FS . 3Racist deunK attorney also bragged fo fetltioner $°L intentionaly withheld all . this impeaching material Facts because it would have impeached (10) witnesses and changed He outcome of te trial, ‘I was never going ta let a SAND NIGGER ARAB Like you walk’ Free’ this is why I didnt subpoena any oF your witnesses”. 222 22. ee eee -=. pages 6¥7 (i)