No. 21-5268
Ambus Ray Davis, III v. Nick Ludwick, Warden
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rule criminal-procedure direct-review due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment retrospective-application united-states-constitution
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether newly declared constitutional rule of criminal procedure apply retrospectively
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1. WHETHER ALL NEWLY DECLARED CONSTITUTIONAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO JUDGMENTS OF CONVICTIONS NOT YET FINAL AND PENDING DIRECT REVIEW WHEN THE RULE WAS ESTABLISHED. 2. WHETHER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION PROVIDING STATE NOT DEPRIVE ANY PERSON OF LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW WAS DENIED: NOR DENY TO ANY PERSON WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS. ii .
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)
Attorneys
Ambus Ray Davis
Ambus Ray Davis III — Petitioner