Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . I. Odas Wheeler dewjed €Ffective ASSzS TANCE OF CouSé . When Trial Coumsed Failed To Contre, Entervmer), Call to Teati Fy , The Z3 Eye tess Who Slept over Night At 720 Jnckyon Street behueen october 13,2001 Awol may Z,2002 . , Auswer ! All The Lower Courts Fefuses to Answer this Ques + ond 2. Was wheeler ConéreTyTEONAl RrEeKrTs VZOLATED When The Triak CoukT AMENDED THE CLEmrwRL ; Complaint AT Trak over Wheelers Objector. . | AnSwer ! Ol The Lower Courts feFoses te ANSWwer This po Question 3. was Wheeler ConTETUTIONAL REGHTS To NOT TCE | VEOLATED WHEN HE Was NEVER ENFORMED BEFORE 7h el The Ceimenal Complass EN For matron WovID BE AMENDED . Answer 2 All The Lower Couts fefuses te Aniwer this : . Sveshon Y. ws Wheeler denied effective ASSLOTANCE OF CoumSEb © | Luhen BorH Tefal AND fAprpELLATE Counsel Fareed CRLL MIS ALZBI WITNESSES , STEVE FREL, AzébG ; CAAVON PND Dasmon CaAVON Er BosToW 7A To Tester 79 key Daves AND TEME FRAME fe . VESTION (<) Presentren = ° | 8. Did Srate Commit Piosecrerral MresconDuct | By MilowEnG C.A., CigeesA Caw2 Rv OTHER S$TRTE | LALTNESSES TO TESTE EY FACS ElY Os den ORTH | © Alt The Lower Cavels (e Funea to hnSwes this Anewere > Alt The Ne bs _ . 0 ANSwer th: || | —* Did the State CommrtT PRASEETOR IAG MIsConDutT Foe. FRZGENG TO Tutrlovek Td THE DEFENSE THE || STATE MENT OF THE 23 Wirneddes THAT C.A. a VésT2Frep AT TRoAL SIEPTED OVERNIGHT IN {| THE Hows VonrnG HE TOME FRAmGe SWE ClAtMED {| SHE WHS Boru Sexwally ASSAULTED tle MIE? all The Cower Goucts fefudeds to Aiéiwecr Pras fo | | tho. ums thee Lee DéwzED A FAT TRIAL BECavsb oF f ALL The Comulative ConsTaturrowabl VrobATrons {| ID ELL0RS By The Srrme, Teial Gwar Tera LE Coomset AWD APPELLATE CaouNSEL fo , | ANSWER! AN The Cower Oasis fefuteS #o Avie this | pd gocher | | | Lt QuesTron (S$) Presented |b senses to AnswWét_ i ALL The lower Coutts fetuses to Adswec this +— question ; 8 Weg Wheeler ConSTLTUTZONAL REGIS VrolareD | Whert The Tigl Court Failed Te 9lver the Pequested “other — get” 27g ky ENSTUCTE on ia Answer 2 The Caourés AWSweregpe NO {| ia p. LIRR Trigt Coundée NefFeetive For Fastin gto _malce —_ Sore. the lequected “other Ack” 21 Jury Iutdrweden Were Fiver to Jury by the Cove oo { | | Answer : The Courts Answer wa | (fa. eis ee lee CoNSTLTYTLoNRAL REGHTS VrouUATED fo ent he wis Never Sve Norze By Cour Ps Trial a ontsel oc the State that the [es eg heal “Other Rop” | ZIS Ova LaSTue tro ws Nef Jorg To BE GrVEN _ a ny {| Avswee 7 Ail The Lower Coutds fe fuses jn Answer this | | 3. | Adams V. Bertenad, 455 F.3d 128,452,752 | Audacson WV. Reni, YT F.3d Bt, 8i¥eis (Fth lee zoey | ATizaN@ V. Youngblood, 98 Si Gili) | gare Fes V. Estelle ¥63 U.S. 280 293 103 Sct | 938379 € Ed 2d 090 (1993) a mi tery, 201 Wis 2d Ob 3OV-10. Binta V. Bertrand, 103 €.3d 857 863 (Tce. | Bound Vs Smith, 430 vs. 817,99G Ch ge Pee ad 2 (4977) . Brady Vitary band, 323 us 2stes) ieedy inacyhand, SCI 0h ede | icyand Vi Scotto ead 4 itig ete clei) | pee v. Dawis, 1375. 64.754, 795 (202) i ccis_V, Parke, U6 F.3d 286, 258 (74h ele. 997) ee Galiforma V. Trom Latta 77% vey joy So | ch. S34 81 b.6d td Ng CIT PY). ik amphell V. Vaughn, 204 F. 3d 290,227 (3d cir.zom) | 12 No. f0$060, maceh 4, Nl. | Castor V. Kevituoky, 480 u.s,273 (98) fF Chapmad V. California, Be vg. (2 (467) P| S. 47 PR ge Number ete ina V. Alabama, 399 0.5. 1,4 490) ne | Goleman V. Tobuson, S6b v.$. 680, 658 (2012) a | Coleman. Thompéon, Solus, 222 (991) | ont Away Vv. Polk, #83 F.3d $67, 882 (Mth Cle 2oob) i coutter V, Gramley,93 3d 31¥, 397 (Mh Cie. 19e)—— a | leetse v. Duckwacth, 743 F.2d 80,684 (7t Peay | Dacdernt V. tumiaueight, 477 Ud. loz, M2 (1596) | Delon V. Colocada, 449 F.3d V135(Gole.209). | é ath, V. te Caushtry, 374 F.3d 489 (Tt Cir.2a04) 7 | | Achy Vv. Packer, $37 U-5.3,8 (Zoot). [eae manids V. Perera I3-F, 3d 1309, 1326 N.T | |e Tth Cie. 1996). ae! [ISworth V. Covenhagun, 248 F.3d 634,459 ik Vth cie. Zoot) | Stelle V. Me 6 re, FoR U-F.6%,72 (1 ee | evater VU. Anderson,