No. 21-5276

William H. Bransford v. Dan Winkelski, Warden

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aedpa-standard appellate-counsel civil-commitment dna-evidence due-process habeas-corpus indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When does constructive abandonment by appointed appellate attorney occur during direct appeal?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED apply ina 28 U.S.C. §2254 petition ‘when an indigent defendant has been : : ' constructively abandoned. by appointed appellate attorney | during the direct appeal process? . | 2. Is a direct appeal adjudicated in accord with due process | ‘of. law if appellate attorney challenges the applicability ; : of Chapter 980, a sex offender civil commitment as ‘the : . ; single issue while omitting clearly stronger issues? . oe 3. Was petitioner denied “ineffective assistance of counsel ; ' and/or bue Process when trial attorney failed to hire a DNA expert for the defense in a CODIS case where DNA was the only means of connecting petitioner to the crime? a ‘ a 4. Was counsel constitutionally. ineffective at plea | 7 bargaining stage when petitioner rejected the plea offer . without the benefit of having a DNA expert opinion? , . 5. Whether psychological report conducted by the state without | counsel's knowledge or permission was harmless error?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-18
Waiver of right of respondent Winkelski, Warden to respond filed.
2021-06-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2021)

Attorneys

William H. Bransford
William H. Bransford — Petitioner
William H. Bransford — Petitioner
Winkelski, Warden
Scott Edwin RosenowWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Scott Edwin RosenowWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent