No. 21-5279

Ernest Francis v. Connecticut

Lower Court: Connecticut
Docketed: 2021-08-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process good-time-credits habeas-corpus sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Connecticut Supreme Court erred in affirming the denial of the petitioner's motion to correct an illegal sentence based on the court's interpretation of the state's statutory good-time credit provisions

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : l ; | Nu eskns Veesented | \ou WC \ye ‘ied wes C sik wie) he + PORN 2 TIS Guan Sheadesd NE Review Lor Weber ona | ‘elo er N Ve ° aS Sendenced On \e Dosis of | acco ks cotton | ! : | | | | , | | | | 7 | | ish min . any ; — — _ ‘ P Viner ro Se Pp _ a F ces) teoncis af 148! Corl Brbincm Correclionel Tastifobos A885 SYyoker Road EnSies, CR ob0s2 . Dee he Respondent Shale on C onnecticud FT Na\ Neus Wes ar Aoss 4d 7GS Oc Of the Chie Stales Morey Sos Coc Porate Race. Rocky WAL CY. 06007 &60-A5¢-Sé07 fd Weare Coot Jose | Ran om C.s_, MeOmeld, D' Aucia, Mollns , Welbon Dd Echun ileenne Caact Boiiching,, axi_Ce giles Nye Hart fod, © conecticul oblast, — | . . | | ee ante | | R WES Aichion > oaS¥Aphons\ % Shcdohoy Revi Srons “Kpwawed 3 | Ade med of She Cose i Recsons for CrcoaXins Moe Wei . PF as — ; “Vounss uke, BS S. 73b CASH. ASS "| i Oose Ao vou 404 U.S. eb 44) Cla) . \ | ale Cases — | Shee ye Collette 194 Conn, SoS 321 S07 Aad 994 C450 . (ee | | | ons Ww Ans MWS 98 | \AMY Kon ention en o \\c aed eAeS ast \oheon aSSing | \cde Ruled : Conns Vee “Reackte Book Sechon 43-27 | | . : | : | ; okies FY en Leash Seance! Vay Cock on So Coctectronel Tn sh whyon avs Ker Qoad EoSie, CX. oborz. Q he re ocndhenl sl\s\c ot Co oneckeuk ; aus Weiner oes No. 47a: aAfics & Abe Cre Skly |_| ieens, Bom Cor Qatede Nace Rocny Wij Connec ku ObOb? tel Sb -ASE. 5507 | Sorene Cars “osteo of Ane Ste of Connectcet S opceme Couct Bulboy SL Cogidsd Rate Ndach Tod, Coontedan) Oho | , | Tn Whe Soptsens Cand of Tae aided Sdetes -_ it i Pel\bor toe \ ed RN ec\otar’ i? Xs Signer Respect Gully Qeays Nok a ugsd of Rethocaci iSSue bw Review ne Vag arent \p alow | Roce ORuiens 2 bese I Nocen 5 J9a2 Tektduat Cored avidly of onucder Shale wikeeoeis, | Ray B91532 Ceageaphiccl Nsca Ih Motad Sogetnt Conch Claas nuichen of fimed oo dike caQpeal SAode we Won s 22K Conn We ran She cist of Nos Mohasa S\cXe Cand So Cevigw Nine emesds QQpecsy —NReindsh K ro Noe Quotes sak AS oo SM OP | — Pe PF | | ae | | | \ i | ee , Se Sacenn WY Tewierw) oF Polwa Ao Comeot om Senlence Looted Wamnes Qn ts Ca. ANS Oh tou, Coonechcuk Se_Oceme Costs of AQRe § Doewed bin ab ) adi Caos Dieoue Wocrfor, Cr. ablot | / ES Acwon of Nn. Wie 8s \avoked Ader AY US. & VOS4O). 1 | ! | | | : i | | i Consitohoncl Provisions 3 Slebtoy j | Xoo Ssidas “ee Veluwe | | | I | \Waihel Grcdes Cons¥itvtion Noantlesens KEY | | | | ; | — | t | Se | " : ae | . | . t | Wwe cows oats de L anc\s’ 214 ay pith dla 0 moon the f Coin iv cz ALA actested zOre er Bo, 14 | \\ ny ale DAAC Yani etal Saned hi atte WECM Cin | oe sched oN et Ovob g DUS of Ane wactont Condocted Rants ; ow hele _e Mak Ss } i | ‘Wars De aia Om \ntcore\e Voter meatson a o ars" anttat® mis lor Wt Dumber ot \Woownads Yn Awe ch mn ewer Koos Aon: Nhe Cone celed on vy accurele \ for mats ACEO rt leis VQbonno mrical ond Sociol jcut S Ast s Toe Cond OA Need 15,1642 Sendenced MO Neancis +o | Sv -Weacd im, Osivanormd. Me sus © Several PoS} Comumchon | Q MS Sacluding o& Mota to Comte on TE eget S entents Gf . —-—4 y AVE Chenil 0 tn pococ Pedof Cad. ee | ns | [| : | ; . : : 7 | | | easms Toc . Aang Yh eibon | L_vid dhe Consttvhon stake Dilute She Ove Racess Clause of e Uorted Shedes Consdiinkos Wire tt Of aed was Own Soocord of Review Nor Delkroining Wheliu A on JANKE IAGD Whe Shoko of Coannedseus ollnoed Convichek Q2¢S90,5 eek Mae Socrecon of Nhe Sentence QueSucn’s Ao Coanectst Yeahs Bank Secon ABS oe wand LC PBY GSS wos CKomendad C.R.% UB-22 C.W.B WR Dhetes 3 | “TW. yodiuiel aulbaedy May ob on tone Assposi tion, of AS Onan Cosseck ty Senbtnce | YenQaSed in cn Weyel meaner oc any olper fe Ais gosihon Make in can iiege! pranner”’ Pe — tore Vhe “Codsticadian of CRB SeecMon WR22 Fhe Stee of | cameetes’ was Saka So otdker Vix Ce-Strkncing of Crioniaal Fe sentens Ws Wate Sentenced on Nas Ibasss 0F Inaccutate Cotes Bon : | | | ae | , { ' | On Koen YOR Me “Senntis was Sentenced So Bo Weuc hy Ocdson or ts ou Ans Wenorable oo Minas . “Ving Sendtatin

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-25
Waiver of right of respondent Connecticut to respond filed.
2021-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2021)

Attorneys

Connecticut
Matthew A. WeinerOffice of the Chief State's Attorney, Respondent
Ernest Francis
Ernest Francis — Petitioner