No. 21-5283
Richard Todd Haas v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: fourth-amendment franks-hearing law-enforcement materiality materiality-analysis probable-cause recklessness search-and-seizure search-warrant
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Fourth Circuit err in refusing to engage in a materiality analysis of the information omitted from the affidavits to determine whether the omissions support a reasonable inference of recklessness sufficient to grant a request for a Franks hearing
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented in this case is whether the Fourth Circuit ii erred in refusing to engage in a materiality analysis of the information omitted from the affidavits to determine whether the omissions support a reasonable inference of recklessness sufficient to grant a request for a Franks hearing.
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-07-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2021)
Attorneys
Richard Haas
William Jeffrey Dinkin — William J. Dinkin, PLC, Petitioner
William Jeffrey Dinkin — William J. Dinkin, PLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent