Is there legally sufficient evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the required element for fraudulent schemes for which the petitioner was convicted?

Questions Presented for Review Is there legally sufficient evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the required element for fraudulent schemes for which the petitioner was convicted? Was the petitioner's due process and double jeopardy violated when the Superior court imposed an unlawful double punishment by sentencing petitioner to a consecutive term on the Theft of a Credit Card by Fraudulent Means? : The petitioner's indictment was insufficient as a matter of law, it failed to allege the essentials elements that could not be cured by the trial court, or prosecution by amendment or through jury instructions. Did the state present insufficient indictment of Multiplicity? i