No. 21-529
Bataski Bailey v. Fair & Walker Unit Owners Association, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 5th-amendment attorney-misconduct civil-rights defamation due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-proceeding judicial-proceedings legal-ethics
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do intentional false statements by an attorney violate opposing party's rights?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Do intentional false statements made by an attorney ina judicial proceeding violate the opposing party’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights? 2. Can attorney’s fees be awarded to a party for the alleged defamation of any attorney during a legal proceeding if the statements alleged to be defamatory are in fact true?
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-29
Brief of respondents Fair & Walker Unit Owners Association, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2021-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 29, 2021.
2021-11-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 8, 2021 to November 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent Empire Parking Services, Inc. to respond filed.
2021-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Bataski Bailey
Bataski Bailey — Petitioner
Empire Parking Services, Inc.
Lawrence B. Domenico — Mozley, Finlayson & Loggins, LLP, Respondent
Fair & Walker Unit Owners Association, Inc. and Access Management Group, L.P.
Adam C. Joffe — Goodman McGuffey, LLP, Respondent