Patrick C. Lynn v. Debra Lundry
Did the 10th Circuit err in failing to hold its D.C.T. Judge Mclaren had a statutory duty under 28 USC § 144 to refer my affidavit of prejudice to another D.C.T. Judge to determine if that D.C.T. Judge Mclaren's refusal to comply with his statutory duties deprived me of due process & equal protection under the 14th Amendment
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . (.) Did the |0™ Creurk err in feulcng to hold és D.CL. Tudge Melqren had a statutory sty 9 Aer 2B USC $s \44 to Teter ny Ai davet of yudice to another Dp. Ct. Sudge te determine é that KS dD-CF. Judge telaren's refusal to Comply with his Statrtory dyes deprived me of due process 4 equal protection ot the law under Ste 14 A mendme at ral 2) didthe om creutt err in Laulea Yo Tecoqnuze my, , likewise reverse ‘the D.Ct.s denial oF an LP excep ON yn dor 2B VSCIUS(S) In KS D-Ch. MAF 20-V-BUEETS BD DA the (0% Cir. EN. ere in fackagto appt, counsel On Wy webhal€ Thereby denying me mezningtol Court Kes Under tte (st Amendment under the Unusual Seuerely Onerus & Retaliatory Burdens imposed by te D.C. Tor semply Rong the Toles OF (aw Required me 4o AO ,\-e-, seo x change of Ju dge ushere = bonatrde contlict o€ nderst required me to act undor 3S USC %AST £55144. 4) SAtke WatnctCourt's ZHOntaken Am Voc#O Against Petchoner Recause CE RY thoners TasignidCant SyThree MottGns precgedt Dac Nemonst. pan AD. Ch > vage fe reve Mas ve, Hatted { Alf) WHG2 Vil feNche —Aaipieanilghul Kecese Bb dantcer Soe Deny. feae ral Court KeleC In Good trarth 4 er SS Isheg 4) . “ 2