Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to ministerially order the setting aside of two $74,000 judgments due to extrinsic fraud and exceptional circumstances

No question identified. : 4 . ONE QUESTION TO ORDERS-“JUDGMENT”: MANDAMUS PETITION : . Joined 29-Respondents clear errors compel Mandamus Ministerial Oath of Office (“MOOF”) Warranty | Assumed Risk violate civil rules: unlawful (cagze-2-701) Hicks/Twombly last resort RCL Pro Se petition} ; Order Of Hon. John Roberts Chief (“HJRC") Justice: ministerially order to set ‘ aside two $74,000-judgments for ta extrinse fraud exceptional circumstances to stop petition for “oa 43-years in 9-elections with leave to amend consolidated reliefcomplaint “Sibling Case B Parts I : & II,” part it clerk Krueger didnot file; Part! filed,” intrinsic 144fraud inconsistent claims for relief by co-sign any : competent lawyer a HJRC Justice letter is needed to hire one, to satisfy 2-judges: two-vexatious litigant orders: for first 100% jury trial verdict a (“ITV-DP-R'}}| [FN#17] (Mca 25-7-103) be complete . Nov. 15, 2022 for 2024 election; by Rules Of Civil Procedure for justiciability admissible evidence. Support of Order): Of HJRC Justice: (i) for his time, treasure & talent by clear legal no discretion &no discrimination: duty ministerially paid: $277,700+ no discretion for competitive neutrality stop absolute despotism public consumer harm by Joined 29-Respondents (72%/21-lawyers) known | public salary $1,153,186+ to enforce petitioned Rules Civil Procedure 8(b)(6), 8(d)(3), 8(c){1), | 15(a)(2), 60(d)(3) as guide-rules. (ii) HJRC last ministerial officer to minister mandamus (mcagz7-26-102) . existing civil-tort law, not Hicks/Twombly et al decisis-judge made case . : “studies” (3'¢ party); (iii) HJRC a public oath charge, pre-sworn to Rule 5.4 Oath aka MOOF Warran Assumption of Risk for patriotic Pledge of Allegiance fiv) to vorrectil03+i4=147 frauds on courtby factoro collateral damage mca: 27-1-307(1) (v) for withholding justiciability of admissible fact/law evidence (vi) Case B: Part I (1-notice only: wade J, Dahood Pro Se; Exhibit a-8547 (3-page) & Part II (3-Notices Only: Paumie Lussy, Exhibit A-8529 (1-pge); Exhibit A-8530 (1-pge) & Exhibit A-8531 (2-pge)) “Notice(s) of ‘Lien’ /Not Due” (vii) set aside two-“vexatious litigant,” two $74,000-judgments in two orders: (viii) a 2"4 juror verdict to verify re: “unreadable” unable to understand complaint after they destroyed Mom’s Revocable Living Will & Testament a fraudulent bait & switchmcagzs-2-701) to catch-kill & erase the faces of Blessed Parents: DHL/HFL in care of son RCL Pro Se: “(when) your mother died her Living Trust died” is actual fraud mca 28-2-405 (3)thatprompted Exhibit A-8306 “Full Release of Recipients...” kept a secret with then presiding Pro Se Judge RJ. Dayton subsequently recused after advising WJD Pro Se no Intestate Probate DP 18-31 need be filed. Both knew no other authority: no power of attorney, estate administrator existed. Thereafter, Joined 29-Respondents: manipulated & falsified Exhibit A-8306 to obtain estate income & property directed into names of others; & hid Mother's assets intended for 25-percent equal sharing: ring; 1918 Tammany Street life estate, Butte Georgetown Mining & Milling Inc. from decedent heir RCL Pro Se. During HPL’s of insightful Mom. She got angry for his unkind: no-tell: where or return; noisily walked roof built an unsightly wood windmill as payback disallowing back yard garden. Life-long loving 94.7-year old Mom DNA refused HPL distemperance. Only made worse by ABA participate, aid & abet cartel mafia in gov't control 24/7 sabotage 43-years. ]f'Sibling: Case B” Mont. Mandamus OP-19-573] denied 100% jury verdict by Hicks/Twombly etc. et al hearsay precedent Part 1 DV-18-37/pa 19-577 (bahood) Part Il DV-18-38/pa 19-578 (Paumie Lussyy MT Supreme Ct, US Writ Certiorari 20-5028/20-5029. Bla 100% jury trial verdict due process redress: 2-judges (State-&-Federal), 2-juror oaths (group & person) 4-cameras. 1 RCL write jury questions, instructions & verdict form. No more lawyer mollycoddling & mentoring f/lawyer judge@ bench. : ii | LIST OR: