Is petitioner entitled to the Pennsylvania courts' clarifying interpretation of the witness intimidation statute, Pa.C.S.A.§4952, under which petitioner was convicted?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |. Is SETITIONER ENTITLED TO THE Keneld oF THE PENNSYLVANIA GoeRem Courks CLARIEYING INTERQRETATION OF TE WITNESS INTIMIDATION STATUTE, Pa.C.S.A.S4952, wrickl PETITIONER WAS CONICTED? Z. CAN QETITIONER, ConSiSTENT wit) FEDEQAL DUE PROCESS, CONTINUESLY RE ConWicYED AND INCARCERRTED AccoRING To THE CLARIEVING INT EPRETATIDN OF THE WITNESS INTIMIDATION | STRTUTE WHEDE, PETITIONER 19 GIEGED TD NAVE | ONLY Mabe A PECUNIARY OFFER 0@ PDSSIRLY | OTHER BENEFITS TO THE WITNESS To Not Come To CouRT ° 4, Recourse Petitioners Lies ofluckundy +o Case tris Parkicular Cloin wasein kre U.S. Sistrick Cond Gea, Should the dickeick couck (nave cemnanded back to Ane , Store, Conck foc a detecanination an whelher or anak Pekikioners Conduct covichies Lhe elements of wikneds intimidation, 1B AW.CS.ASHABL, AS ProPey inkerrered WW This AtackeS Widest Cock? 1