No. 21-5314
Thomas Brantley Jenkins, II v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553 18-usc-3582 compassionate-release criminal-sentencing district-court-review judicial-discretion motion-analysis primary-contentions sentencing-factors statutory-interpretation written-findings
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court fully considers the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when ruling on a compassionate release motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) if it fails to address one of the defendant's primary contentions in its written findings of fact
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. WHEN RULING ON A MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), DOES A DISTRICT COURT FULLY “CONSIDER THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN 18 U.S.C § 3553(a)” IF IT FAILS TO ADDRESS ONE OF DEFENDANT'S PRIMARY CONTENTIONS IN ITS WRITTEN FINDINGS OF FACT? ii
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Thomas Brantley Jenkins
John David Bryson II — Wyatt Early Harris Wheeler LLP, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent