No. 21-5315
Rafael Arturo Coto Chinchilla v. Louisiana
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: closing-arguments criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct sufficiency-of-evidence trial-error
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the evidence sufficient to support the guilty verdict?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WAS THE EVIDENCE IN THE INSTANT CASE INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A> Oo GUILTY VERDICT ON ALL THREE COUNTS OF THE BILL OF INFORMATION? . 2. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN OVERRULLING THE OBJECTION DURING : 2 REBUTTAL CLOSING ARGUMENTS, WHEN THE PROSECUTOR : ; : MISCHARACTERIZED THE EMERGENCY ROOM DOCTOR’S TESTIMONY, . THUS MISLEADING THE JURY AND TAINTING THE OUTCOME OF THE TRIAL? .
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2021-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 7, 2021)
Attorneys
Louisiana
Shae Gary McPhee Jr. — Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent
Rafael Arturo Coto Chinchilla
Rafael Arturo Coto Chinchilla — Petitioner