No. 21-5322

André J. Twitty v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-law federalism first-amendment preemption state-statute statutory-interpretation supremacy-clause void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Assimilative Crimes Act confer jurisdiction upon a federal court to assimilate and alter the elements of an unconstitutional state statute to render it constitutional?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . (D Does 16usc/3@), The. Assia ‘lative. Crimes Act Conkerl bert sdic tion | | Upor. a federal Court To assvimilate and alter the. A elements J ok an UnconstiteTiona.! Strie. Statute. To render (+ Constitutional e (2) lQoes the. recent cating of the State of Colo rade Supreae Court, (7 | feople Tr The Interest of & D. ( Colo. 20200 Violate the. First Armenchment and This Court's hold ine in. kloris v. Charted States. r | ; | O Dees the Suprertacy Clause To the United States Constitution, | TrValidak a State Statute, that 18 in Conthet witha federal law | ora federa! Constitutional hieht ° Does the Furth Amendrent anc the F'tth Amendment Void ~ For Va. puene ss Doctrine kramit Soaneone. To he. Convicted under an Uncen sti te tronal Statute r | Gi) |

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-07-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Andre J. Twitty
Andre J. Twitty — Petitioner
Andre J. Twitty — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent