No. 21-5334

Cecile A. Brown v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process government-defendants governmental-defendants judicial-review legal-presumption presumption standing supreme-court-doctrine voluntary-cessation
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the doctrine of voluntary cessation applies less stringently to governmental defendants than to private ones?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the doctrine of voluntary cessation applies less stringently to governmental defendants than to private ones? The Supreme court has never suggested that government defendants should get special treatment under the voluntary-cessation doctrine. Supreme Court should reject a presumption in favor of government defendants when applying voluntary — cessation principles.

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2021)

Attorneys

Cecile A. Brown
Cecile A. Brown — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent