No. 21-5350
Bobby Earl Keys v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review compassionate-release criminal-procedure district-court-discretion due-process prisoner-release sentencing sentencing-factors standard-of-review statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals apply the wrong appellate standard of review?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DID THE FIETH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS APPLIED THE WRONGED APPELLATE STANDARD OF REVIEW TO CLAIM THAT DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED STATUTORY ERROR _ UNDER 18 U.S.C.§§3142(g), 3553(a), BY FAILING TO ADDRESS THE “STATUTORY FACTORS WHETHER IT IS "NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE PRISONER TERM OF IMPRISONMENT DESPITE THE EXTRAORDINARY AND COMPELLING REASONS [FOR GRANTING RELEASE] IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE PURPOSES OF PUNISHMENT THAT COMPELLED THE COURT TO IMPOSE THE ORIGINAL TERM OF IMPRISONMENT?" , TST OF PARTIES All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the coverage page. A list of all
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 13, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent