No. 21-5351

Chauntel Jackson v. Transportation Security Administration

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights discrimination due-process retaliation standing
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the discrimination and retaliation under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 constitute a violation of due process, and whether there is a right-to-sue before filing suit in the federal courts

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED SS TS the HEAL gpeteuis A lanuaut 5 Caused gel ght of due. rpoce, is rere 4 pene Cepia +6 have A Right-to-Sve. feller, before Flug duit in the Sedeon! covets She diserimiuabou aud eebelinbians 2 Uuder. Te. Vil Gui) Rights Ace oF 190, does, diserimiunds beloce) hao crabs Sob feceut poe, does the Aisegimiuatiow have $3 be Babe iu Gator or dimilae, ju Salwee to qualify As diseeimiuadou ? rs it illegal to Sie Au G Soe $ikun a ERD. disegim uueleou Gmpliut empbye vali, Lint cliswein uplee REDO? elf Ones 8 CASE Qualify 0 egurtable tolliug wheu-the Com er Me cea mislead nud hee CRE mishaudk ¢ Baud (oul Bn 13,527 US (901M 13th me cell i by ee Oe do. Shui & Aptomabicly Qiieu to th Complain flee. [3Ddlays 7

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-01
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-10
Waiver of right of respondent TSA to respond filed.
2021-08-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 13, 2021)

Attorneys

Chauntel Jackson
Chauntel Jackson — Petitioner
Chauntel Jackson — Petitioner
TSA
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent