No. 21-5361

Eduardo Flores v. Sharp Grossmont Hospital

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-08-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment ada-1990 americans-with-disabilities-act court-accommodation due-process equal-access meaningful-access meaningful-accommodation self-represented-litigant
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County and the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District violated the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution and the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 by failing to provide Mr. Flores, a disabled self-represented litigant, with meaningful accommodation and equal access to the court

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED (Rule 14.1(a))s—=<“‘( iaé‘a‘ SWC Whether the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County and the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District violated the 14° Amendment of the United States Constitution and the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 by failing to | provide Mr. Flores, a disabled self-represented litigant, with meaningful accommodation and equal access to the court.

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-16
Waiver of right of respondent Sharp Grossmont Hospital to respond filed.
2001-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 13, 2021)

Attorneys

Eduardo Flores
Eduardo Flores — Petitioner
Eduardo Flores — Petitioner
Sharp Grossmont Hospital
Brian Ted BloodworthLotz, Doggett & Rawers, Respondent
Brian Ted BloodworthLotz, Doggett & Rawers, Respondent