whether-new-judgment-restarts-one-year-time-limitation

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : Whether, consistent with this Court’s holdings in Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147 | (2007), an intervening new judgment between two habeas petitions restarts the one7 year time limitation even when the second petition challenges the underlying ; conviction rather than the new sentence? i | Whether, consistent with this Court’s holdings in Magwood v. Patterson, 561 U.S. 320 | (2010), where there is a new judgment intervening between two habeas petitions, an | application challenging the resulting new judgment is not second or successive even when the second petition challenges the underlying conviction rather than the new sentence? ;