No. 21-5376
Samuel Roy Abram v. David Leu, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process exhaustion-of-remedies prison-litigation-reform-act standing
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner required to request consideration of an unwritten grievance, for a valid reason under PLRA?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A) Was paitioner Samui. oy Nore reaunred undeYre PLAK +O Teauest considerton of an uatineh) drtevance, for a.vahd Yeadon Auetn SafPiterketence, 7 1) Was gextioner Samvah Ran) Rov, yeauitedto adnaust adccinhdrode Penedids Wade Bevo Girt bourke ( CROQVRALS Ayestioned the availa of due to he. allegations and euidence Presontedi’ } / 3) Shrovld-the Court have talon Sudicid) Natio oP Ane admin Satrrtive Yemedies Aled within the rvso years oF the dade rincdart! |
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent