Must a Citizen exhaust his State's remedies before filing in the Federal Court for a decision upon a Constitutional issue?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. Must a Citizen exhaust his State’s remedies before filing in the Federal Court for a decision upon a Constitutional issue? B. When a State makes a Pre-hearing seizure of property due to a claimed “emergency situation”, must the State give an original hearing as soon as practicable after the taking with full Due Process Rights given to the accused including providing Assistance of Council to economic indigents? C. Does an appeal of an Executive Branch taking of property, without a preor post-taking hearing, satisfy the Original Hearing guarantee under the Fourteenth Amendment? D. Does the Attorney General of California himself constitute: “a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority? : under 27 Code of Federal Regulations 478.11 (a), allowing him to legally declare a citizen a Mental Defective under 18 United States Code 992(g)(4) and strip him of his tight to keep and bear firearms and property? eee 2