1. Whether the approximately $40,000 fine assessed by the State Bar is an
excessive fine under Timbs v. Indiana 586 U.S.—(2019) for a $460-financial
violation.

2. Whether the Court of Appeal and the District Court violated a pro se
litigant's due-process right under the Fifth and Fourth Amendments by
failing to grant him a hearing over the entire appeal period when recent
Supreme Court cases and statutory construction were involved in a
bankruptcy case.

3. Whether the district Court acted prejudicially in dismissing Petitioner's
appeal pursuant to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009 in violation
of AMG Capital Management LLC v. FTC 19-508 April 22, 2021.

Whether the approximately $40,000 fine assessed by the State Bar is an excessive fine under Timbs v. Indiana 586 U.S.—(2019) for a $460-financial violation