Whether the approximately $40,000 fine assessed by the State Bar is an excessive fine under Timbs v. Indiana 586 U.S.—(2019) for a $460-financial violation

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the approximately $40,000 fine assessed by the State Bar is an excessive fine under Timbs v. Indiana 586 U.S.—(2019) for a $460-financial violation. 2. Whether the Court of Appeal and the District Court violated a pro se litigant’s due-process right under the Fifth and Fourth Amendments by failing to grant him a hearing over the entire appeal period when recent Supreme Court cases and statutory construction were involved in a bankruptcy case. 3. Whether the district Court acted prejudicially in dismissing Petitioner's appeal pursuant to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009 in violation of AMG Capital Management LLC v. FTC 19-508 April 22, 2021. ii LIST OF ALL PARTIES TO THIS PROCEEDING ALBERT MIKLOS KUN, Petitioner, In Pro Se and In Forma Pauperis STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. a