Whether the court should grant certiorari, vacate the circuit's ruling, and demand further consideration in light of Strickland v. Washington and Napue v. Illinois

questions presented are: | T. Should this Court grant certiorari Vacate, thre Circuit's ruling , and Cemand for further consideration in light of Strickland v. Washington, Hlole U.S. 68 (1484), for fhe. Boyd's counsels’ failure +0 object Joinadmissible evidence! (The Search Warrant and Supporting Affidavit) ? ) IL. Should this Court grant Cettiorari, Vacate the Circuit’s ruling, and Semand for further Consideration in Night of Nopue v. Tiineig, 360 U5. 2604, 24 (1959) ; which announced thet coowiction alstained Anrouah he use of Folse evidence known 40 he such by cepresentatives of the State must fall under Ve Fourte ent Arnemdenent 2 | | . | | | | I