No. 21-5398
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process emergency-call evidence hearsay-exception sixth-amendment testimonial-statements
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit fail to correctly apply the objective primary purpose test for testimonial statements made during a 911 call when the Government declined to have the available caller testify?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit fail to correctly apply the objective primary purpose test for testimonial statements made during a 911 call when the Government declined to have the available caller testify. 1
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent