No. 21-5409
Antonyo Reece v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court judicial-discretion pepper-precedent pepper-v-united-states rehabilitation-evidence sentencing sentencing-variance upward-departure
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether imposing an upward departure of 200 months to a criminal defendant who has exemplary rehabilitation evidence is incongruous to this Court's holding in Pepper v. United States
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether imposing an upward departure of 200 months to a criminal defendant who has exemplary rehabilitation evidence is incongruous to this Court’s holding in Pepper v. United States, 52 U.S. 476, 131 S. Ct. 1229, 179 L. Ed. 2d 196 (2011). STATEMENT REGARDING PARTIES TO THE CASE The names of all parties to the case are contained in the caption of the case. Reece Petition for Writ of Certiorari Page ii
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Antonyo Reece
James Patrick Whalen — Whalen Law Office, Petitioner
James Patrick Whalen — Whalen Law Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent