Jereme Eugene Mackey v. United States
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the district court erred in finding the appellant guilty due to ineffective counsel
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. | WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN FINDING THE APPELLANT JEREME EUGENE MACKEY GUILTY INASMUCH AS THE GOVERNMENT FAILED TO PROVE AT THE TIME OF ARRAIGNMENT THE ELEMENTS NECESSARY FOR A CONVICTION FOR CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE AND POSSESS HEROIN, MARIJUANA AND COCAINE, ALL IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 21, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTIONS 841(A)(1), 841(B)(1)(A) AND (B)(1)(D) DUE IN PART TO COUNSEL’S EFFECTIVENESS Il. | WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED INASMUCH AS IT FAILED TO PROVIDE THE APPELLANT JEREME EUGENE MACKEY WITH CREDIT FOR THE NINE (9) MONTHS THAT HE WAS IN CUSTODY AWAITING TRIAL. Il. WHETHER THE APPELLANT JEREME EUGENE MACKEYS SENTENCE WAS UNREASONABLE AS IT WAS GREATER THAN NECESSARY AND AS SUCH, FAILS TO COMPLY WITH TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 3553? 1