No. 21-5440
Joseph Augustus Dixon v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 60(b) civil-procedure death-of-mother federal-habeas-corpus judicial-discretion legal-relief medication procedural-motion rule-60b untimely-filing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal Reviewing Courts abused their discretion in denying Petitioner's F.R.C.P. 60(b)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : | QUESTION #1 PRESENTED “Whether the Federal Reviewing Courts abused their discretion in ; . denying Petitioner’s F.R.C.P. 60(b) when Petitioner’s assertion of being on high doses of medication; and the death of his mother were valid grounds to override Petitioner’s untimely filing of his § 2254 Federal Habeas Corpus, thereby allowing Petitioner’s amended version should be heard on the merits in this proceeding pursuant to established federal laws? | i |
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-25
Waiver of right of respondent state of florida to respond filed.
2021-07-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 22, 2021)
Attorneys
state of florida