No. 21-545

Michael B. Ellis, et al. v. United States

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-10-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-review due-process judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigation record-falsification recusal standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS _ record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Question 1: Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS _ record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges? Question 2: When U.S. district judges are credibly accused of committing explicit acts of misconduct via sworn §§455 and 144 motions filed by litigants, should the judges recuse from further participation in cases involving those victims/litigants?! 1 The extra-judicial misconduct of The Honorables Christopher Reid Cooper and Amy Berman Jackson on September 27, 2016 is detailed below, Question 2., Pg. 12. i

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due November 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Michael B. Ellis, et al.
Michael B. Ellis — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent