No. 21-5451
John M. Wasson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal criminal-procedure criminal-trial due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions legal-counsel mining-claim right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was defendant provided adequate counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ° The questions presented are: . 1. Did Mr. Wasson have adequate counsel during his trial and appeal? 2, Was Mr. Wasson's accessing his mining claim's campsite in fact lawful? 3. Did the government prove ali aspects of the charge against him? . , 4. Did allowing unrelated court cases into testimony unduly prejudice the jury? 5. Were the jury instructions prejudicial towards the Defendant? ~,, —(“‘“‘S; CO”*# + Petitioner is John M. Wasson , ; Respondent is the United States of America
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 22, 2021)
Attorneys
John M. Wasson
John M. Wasson — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent