No. 21-546
Michael G. Harper, aka Cuban Mike v. United States
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-justice-reform criminal-resentencing district-court district-court-discretion first-step-act intervening-legal-developments legal-developments reduced-sentence sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, when deciding if it should 'impose a reduced sentence' on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, a district court must or may consider intervening legal developments
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented here is the same as that presented in Concepcion v. United States, No. 20-1650, on which this Court recently granted certiorari: Whether, when deciding if it should “impose a reduced sentence” on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, a district court must or may consider intervening legal developments. (i)
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Concepcion</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2021-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-13
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 13, 2021.
2021-11-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2021 to December 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Michael Harper
Catherine Emily Stetson — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent